Faith of the Fathers. Who?

Tis always interesting that when a lot of 'christiandom' talks about the 'fathers' they go back to around 300AD. Wrong fathers.

The 'fathers' of 'christianity' are the disciple/apostles that were the eleven of the twelve elected and selected one Yeshua(Jesus) personally chose as He was led by THE FATHER that dwelt in Him. 

After the fall of Judas Iscariot, the only disciple of the twelve that was not a Galilean, the other eleven voted in a 'replacement'. There is nothing else ever said about this new 'twelfth' that was voted in. We really do not know much about him. We do know that later JesusGod chose Saul of Tarsus(Paul) but there is no Scripture that places him as the twelfth. 

Why is this important? Because the other eleven were in the Upper Room on the day of Pentectost when Elohim of Genesis 1:1 stepped inside them.  Paul had his own experience, but it always pointed BACK to Pentecost. 

So when we talk about 'fathers', it is to those eleven, and even Judas Iscariot could be added as the father of the not-so-good side. 

Understanding who the 'fathers' are is important when coming to the very end of the Hebrew Testament, or Old Testament that the Gentiles like to call it - wrongly. 

Malachi is the last book indexed in the Hebrew Bible. The one important verse that Jesus mentions has to do with John the Baptist and the Spirit of Elijah. Jesus identified John the Baptist as the first part of Malachi 4:6.

Malachi 4:5 - Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

Mal 4:6 - And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

It is noticeable that Jesus never mentioned the second part of verse 7. ".. the heart of the children to their fathers ..".

Jesus showed clearly that the the fathers of Israel, and followers, would point to someones called the children.  John the Baptist pointed people to Jesus, but Jesus was not 'children'. The 'children' would have had to be the birth of the Gentile called out ones that happened on the day of Pentecost.

This is very important. Jesus never annihilated the Hebrew Bible. He actually was there in Israel for the lost sheep of Israel. Lost from what? Understanding properly the God of Genesis 1.  And Jesus was showing those 'elected' that Genesis 1's Elohim was now inside Jesus. Jesus was simply the 'image' that they could see and touch representing the unfathomable Elohim.

Fathers to Children. They merge on the day of Pentecost.  The Fathers of Israel were the beginning ot the Elohim Faith. The Children were the OFFSPRING of the Elohim Faith. The old was not trashed for the new. Pentecost was the birthing of the opportunity for Gentiles to be grafted into the Original Elohim Faith.  Jesus Christ gave the Gentiles that opportunity.

So.. what would the second part of Malachi 4:6 do? Obviously there would come a time that the Gentile Children would have to have their hearts pointed BACK to the FATHERS. 

Who are these second fathers. There are two choices :

1. The fathers of the Gentile grafting.

2. The same fathers that Israel had always followed.

Number 1 is essentially number 2 with Yeshua added in the 'equation'.  What is the equation? Maybe 1 + 1 = 1

So if the Spirit of Elijah came after the end of the time of the gentiles, thus to Israel.. something doesn't fit.  Israel at the end time is not called 'children'. I suppose there could be an opinion that they are the 'children' of the restored nation of Israel, but that is pretty weak. Mainly because God is usually speaking about 'believers', not the nation as a whole. And the believers in Israel are anchored to the Torah just as the Disciples/Apostles were in Jesus of Nazareth day.  So 'Torah' cannot be children and fathers at the same time. 

Israel will get their 'Elijah' but the book of Revelation of Jesus Christ is clear in chapter 11 that he will be one of the two witnesses/prophets that appear in Israel for the world to see.

That leaves someone that will point the gentiles, children, back to the 'fathers'. Their hearts, their Faith, will match those individuals on the day of Pentecost. There was no New Testament. There was no Paul. 

It is vital to know what those people had and then received on the day of Pentecost. THAT is the Template. The 'called out ones' will have their hearts anchored right there. 

This is what I believe... comma,

T.H.Tatman

GodComma.com


.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Queen of Israel

Just pondering again.. Jesus came to Israel as 'Son of Man', so He could let them kill Him in order to blind them.. So He could get a Gentile Bride as 'Son of God' via the day of Pentecost template.. So that He could reveal Himself to Israel at the end time as 'Son of David' for the Millennium. Matthew 1:1 - "The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David , the son of Abraham. .." Mark 12:35 - "And Jesus answered and said, while he taught in the temple, How say the scribes that Christ is the Son of David?" Matthew 21:15 - "And when the chief priests and scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying in the temple, and saying, Hosanna to the Son of David ; they were sore displeased, 21:16 - And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?" " The Messiah of whom we have been s...
Read more

Israel Gentiles Constantine

Think about it, the Jews didn't kill Jesus. He just allowed Rome to kill him - but remember, only because he let them.  But after that, it was the Jews killing the ones that were called "Christians".  It was later that they were called Christians, a term which could put them in a box. Why kill Jesus and Christians? Mostly because of political and financial reasons that were being hindered by Jesus. Positions of power were threatened. The Jews themselves were very used to Gentile pagans and their multi god fiascos. It's just that this time they were using something that was close to their heart : Elohim. And later, the old friends of Paul didn't like what he was doing and so they tended to follow him around and torment people who were followers of Jesus of Nazareth, and the day of Pentecost had really thrown the curve ball of this situation. Years later Constantine took advantage of this with his not-so-wonderful political maneuver, and as a Gentile himself, he pul...
Read more

I Never Capitalize satan

The Bible is very clear that God made both good and that which is evil. God Himself is not evil, but he made the scenario - on purpose - that would let 'evil' manifest. "Thus G‑d created a world in which goodness and evil are equal options, and He created humanity with the freedom to choose." Chabad org "I am the Lord, there is none else; I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and create evil" Isaiah 45:6-7 “See, I [God] have set before thee this day life and good, and death and  evil .” Deuteronomy 30:15 Rabbi Singer says it this way, "In essence, Satan is an agent of God, and has no free will or independent existence." He then discusses the book of Job and how satan had to ask God for permission. Then he adds his thought about Christians : "They clearly grasped that a Bible which asserts that God creates evil, calls into question Christendom’s rigid teachings on salvation." OutreachJudaism org The best interpretation, f...
Read more